Obama Already Changing Washington

Jun 05, 10:41 AM CST

At the request of Senator Obama, the DNC will no longer be taking money from Washington lobbyists. The following statement was released by Chairman Howard Dean:

“The DNC and the Obama Campaign are unified and working together to elect Barack Obama as the next president of the United States. Our presumptive nominee has pledged not to take donations from Washington lobbyists and from today going forward the DNC makes that pledge as well,” Dean said. “Senator Obama has promised to change the way things are done in Washington and this step is a sure sign of his commitment. The American people’s priorities will set the agenda in an Obama Administration, not the special interests.”

– by vanhorn | Send this to a friend

  1. Too bad Obama has taken a lot of money from lobbyists during his campaign. I guess that’s the change he was talking about. What a liar. He’ll do anything to get elected. I guess he truly is a Chicago style politician. Hell, he’s even slicker than Slick Willy himself. I just hope people wake up before the November Election. Obama is no different than the politicians of the past with his dirty deeds and tricks. Howard Dean will be Obama’s lap dog. The DNC and superdelegates are pathetic at best. Superdelgates are saying they are supporting the will of the people but Obama didn’t even have a consesus of the popular vote. The DNC is afraid of upsetting new voters and African-American voters but what about the rest of the the party’s base? Go ahead and promote your elist candidate. But I find it strange the Obama has all these Washington insiders helping him and he says he wants to change Washington. Good try with that. The only change Obama has is in his pocket.
    Rick    Jun 05, 11:36 AM CST #
  2. Glory Hallelujah! It is a start.
    carol    Jun 05, 09:13 PM CST #
  3. Rick,
    Please quit spewing recycled Limbaugh rubbish and contribute an original thought – if you can.
    ed charrington    Jun 05, 11:27 PM CST #
  4. So Eric, as a Democrat, who will you vote for in November? Curious minds want to know.
    Steven Dawes    Jun 06, 07:38 AM CST #
  5. Ed,
    I don’t even listen to Rush Limbaugh. I was just stating what was on my mind. Gee, I must not be the only one to think that way. You must be an Obama supporter because all they do is bash Hillary supporters. Why don’t you come up with an original response?
    Rick    Jun 06, 08:39 AM CST #
  6. Rick, take a cue from your candidate. It’s over. Obama is the nominee. He won. Time to unite the party.
    Dave Sund    Jun 06, 11:08 AM CST #
  7. Dave,
    Just because “my ” candidate was pressured to support Obama doesn’t mean I have to.
    You Obama supporters have some nerve telling Hillary supporters what to do. Just like an Obama supporter to have a condescending attitude. And by the way he’s the presumptive nominee. There is a long ways until the August convention and anything can happen. Obama’s friend Rezko could bring him down with his guilty verdict.
    Rick    Jun 06, 11:25 AM CST #
  8. Rick having been an ardent supporter of Howard Dean I can understand you frustration with the system. Hillary did a good job but sadly came up short. I can remember when nearly all primary contests were contested and there was always a feeling of anger and let down. However, remember those very same groups that supported Obama this time around elected Bill Clinton twice to the presidency and Hillary Clinton twice to the Senate.
    However, last year when Hillary Clinton thought she would win in a walk she did not concern herself with Nebraska. How many local candidates have listed either of the Clinton’s as donors during the past eight years?
    The people who voted for Barack Obama were good well-motivated people who simply weighed the candidates differntly. My candidate was defeated in Iowa. That is the reality of politics. The majority of Democrats will not get their first choice to President.
    You have two options. You can dwell on the past. However, you can involve yourself with other activity. This does not have to be Obama. We have other Democrats seeking public office. They can always use your help
    Tom    Jun 06, 01:21 PM CST #
  9. Let’s see:

    Obama = liar, Chicago style pol
    Bill Clinton = Slick Willie
    Howard Dean = lap dog
    Super Delegates = pathetic at best

    Does anyone else smell a Republican concern troll lurking about here?

    If Rick is a Democrat, or a Hillary Clinton supporter, then I am Warren Buffett.
    ed charrington    Jun 06, 02:14 PM CST #
  10. Tom,
    Thank you for your supportive words. I plan on supporting local democrats in the fall.
    Rick    Jun 06, 02:19 PM CST #
  11. Ed or should I say Warren,
    I am a register Democrat. I am not a Republican troll. I was voicing my concerns about Obama and the election process. I have the right to voice my opinion. Just because I belong to the Democratic party doesn’t mean I have to like everything it does.
    Rick    Jun 06, 02:25 PM CST #
  12. Rick, I was a Hillary Clinton supporter. Still am. But that was then, this is now. You want to keep fighting a lost cause, go right ahead. You want to help get John McCain elected, you go right ahead. You want to get all pouty because you can’t have your way, you go right ahead. Those of us that are real democrats are going to put all that crap behind us and get democrats, including Barack Obama elected.
    Still - ed charrington    Jun 06, 02:46 PM CST #
  13. Ed,
    At this current moment in time I can’t support a candidate I don’t believe in. I am not pouty I just can’t support a candidate for the good of the party. Maybe in time I will change my mind but until then please respect my decision. In the future I hope this political process gets simpler. There are too many variables that play this process out. Good luck with your campaigning.
    Rick    Jun 06, 03:12 PM CST #
  14. Let me ask you Rick, how much do you believe in John McCain? An empty box for a democrat is the same as a check mark in the box for a Republican. Haven’t you had enough?
    Still - ed charrington    Jun 06, 04:03 PM CST #
  15. I’m an AFSCME member. We spent over 6 MILLION dollars to help Senator Clinton. I’m now on the Obama bus. I still don’t know who those that don’t like Obama are going to vote for?
    Steven Dawes    Jun 06, 07:02 PM CST #
  16. If you support what Hillary Clinton stands for, you simply cannot logically support John McCain for President.
    Dave Sund    Jun 06, 07:15 PM CST #
  17. Like I said before I can’t vote for someone I don’t believe in. I don’t know if I will vote for or support John McCain. I haven’t even looked at his platform. Right now I will have to wait and see. It might depend if Hillary is on the ticket as VP then maybe I’ll vote for Obama. I just don’t like his persona. I don’t care if Obama and Hillary have the same platform. I just can’t vote for someone I believe is not good for the country despite what the democratic party thinks.
    Rick    Jun 06, 08:02 PM CST #
  18. Rick, if the reason you’re saying you can’t vote for Obama is because you don’t believe he’s good for the country, then I’d suggest you take a long hard look at what electing McCain and giving the Republicans another four years in the White House would do to the Supreme Court. We’re not talking 5-4 decisions against every fundamental right you hold dear, we’re looking at 7-2 decisions with Scalia and Thomas leading the way.
    Trevor Fitzgerald    Jun 06, 09:29 PM CST #
  19. Rick! Wake up! Smell the roses!
    Dont tell me your support for Hill was so blind that you weren’t paying attention to what McCain has been saying? You don’t know if you’ll vote for or support another four years of Bush? Sorry, but you got to be a Republican troll. No way you were a Clinton supporter.
    ed charrington    Jun 06, 11:36 PM CST #
  20. Will those Democrats who vote for McCain be pleased if he is elected and gets to select one to three Supreme Court Justices? I was a John Edwards supporter, and still hold hope he will play a part in an Obama administration, but can very easily support Obama, or Clinton, for that matter. There are no perfect candidates; but there damn sure are self serving, corrupt, anti-Constitutional, unAmerican ones—they are known as Republicans! The Bush administration, along with the Republican controlled 109th Congress have shown us just how much damage can be done to our great nation is just a few years.
    Charles Jones    Jun 07, 07:26 AM CST #
  21. Well if we are going into a whose supporters bash the canidates more, Hilary’s supporters are far more negative. Hilary supporters consider Obama to be a young upstart out of Chicago who stole the nomination from Hilary. Excuse me, talk about negative (plus, Hilary is the one who blantently ignored party wishes by campaigning in Florida and Michagan, she shouldn’t be allowed to quote the whole popular vote nonscense).

    This should be about Obama’s victory now and hopefully in November, not about Hilary trying to grab the spotlight. Her as VP would be a bad choice. Obama is now the canidate we should rally around him, support his campaign, and put the primaries behind us.
    cole i    Jun 07, 01:40 PM CST #
  22. Rick,
    I agree 100%. Obama, with the help of Howard, Donna, Nancy…, has divided the Democratic party and if elected in November will destroy our country.
    You are not alone in your anger or determination to stop this fraud from being elected.
    Blu    Jun 08, 09:41 AM CST #
  23. Republican trolls! Aachhhh. They’re stinking up every Democratic blog out there, trying to stir up trouble and get their guy, Sen. McSame, elected.
    ed charrington    Jun 08, 01:28 PM CST #
  24. Alright, let’s take the spirit of Sen. Obama to heart and begin to make some fundamental changes not only in our rhetoric, but in the way we get things done. Anyone else interested in the VEEP sweepstakes? I hope Sen. Obama is not forced to pick Sen. Clinton. He talks about a new form of politics, and this would be a dangerous signal that he is all talk and no action. By far his best choices would be Sen. Biden or Gov. Richardson. What do you think?
    kevin shepherd    Jun 08, 10:55 PM CST #
  25. Sen. Obama could chose someone other than Sen. Clinton as his running mate for the sake of being all action, not just talk, then losing the election. There are nearly as many Democrats that supported Sen. Clinton as Sen. Obama and they are the ones whose sensitivity deserves consideration. A true leader should pick allies that render the ticket invincible. Sen. Clinton is the natural choice.
    ed charrington    Jun 09, 05:50 AM CST #
  26. I am and always will be a Hillary supporter. I can’t with a good conscious support Obama. His associate with Father Pleger ( a 20 year realtionship) and with others who have disrespected Hillary have left me a little “bitter” about Obama. I know he can’t control these people but his apology was lame. I don’t trust the man. Besides he’s still arrogant and self-serving.
    Rick    Jun 09, 09:51 AM CST #
  27. So, Rick, I take it you will be cutting your nose off to spite your own face. If Hillary can’t have it, then Johnny McSame (as Bush) will get your vote.
    ed charrington    Jun 09, 10:09 AM CST #
  28. Ed,
    Like I said before I need some time to think about the candidates. I may not vote at all. I know several people who are not going to vote at all because they don’t like either candidate. American needs to elect a good solid leader despite their party background. A lot of good people don’t run for public office because of all the B.S. and media involved in the nominating process. We still have a lot of time before November to think about America’s future. But we need to select a candidate that’s good for all America and not just one party.
    Rick    Jun 09, 10:39 AM CST #
  29. Maybe Ralph Nader will be more to your liking. Thanks to him we got eight years of Bush Jr. Seriously, Rick, your choices are Obama or McSame. Anyone else will just be a spoiler.
    ed charrington    Jun 09, 11:16 AM CST #
  30. “cutting your nose off to spite your own face” is what the DNC and superdelegates did when they selected Obama as the Democratic nominee.
    If they have to go so far as to select an unqualified black man as the democratic nominee just to prove that they are not racist then most assuredly they are racist! Do they really think that all black Americans are radical far leftwing, white hating, liars and cheats? That’s the stereotypical black created by white supremacist! Does the DNC actually think Obama is the typical black American? Up until this Obama campaign I have never heard so much anti-white, anti-America anti-Clinton garbage come from the Democratic party. I haven’t seen this much racial tension since the ‘60’s and the blame falls squarely on the shoulders of the DNC leaders!
    As for calling me a Republican, since I started supporting Hillary Clinton I’ve been called much worse than that. My skin has become pretty darn thick thanks to the Obama supporters.
    Blu    Jun 09, 11:44 AM CST #
  31. Wow Blu, you sound like some of the folks I knew down in Florida where I went to high school. What are the qualifications you’d need for a black man – white parents, grandparents and great-grandparents? Take off your hood and robes before coming in here again.
    ed charrington    Jun 09, 11:58 AM CST #
  32. “What are the qualifications you’d need for a black man”
    Exactly the same qualifications I would expect from a Caucasian, Hispanic, Asian, Native American… Leadership skills, honesty, integrity, compassion, self-restraint, decisiveness… They need to have the ability to relate to people and a certain degree of empathy yet not make decisions based on those emotions. A candidate should also have an understanding of the issues and plans to solve the nations problems.
    Issues are very important to me but first and foremost a candidate must have strength of character to get my vote.
    BTW, the KKK remark is uncalled for but I guess anyone that isn’t on the Obama bandwagon needs to get use to such remarks.
    Blu    Jun 09, 12:33 PM CST #
  33. Ed,
    I know that you are trying real hard to convince me to support Obama. Like I said before I need some time to evaluate both candidates. I wish Hillary was the democractic candidate but she is not. So now we are stuck with Obama. The press has compared him to JFK and MLK but he doesn’t belong there until he can prove himself worthy. JFK had military service and years of senate experience before he ran. I just don’t believe Obama is ready to led our country. Sure things have gone his way but in reality that was only in Democratic primaries once he hits the national scene with more voters at stake I don’t think he will convince enough people to vote for him. But the press will help with that. If the DNC was smart they would have promote Hillary first then Obama and the democratics could have had the White House for 16 years while Obama gained experience. But the DNC ran the primaries like American Idol – a lot of hype and no substance.
    Rick    Jun 09, 12:37 PM CST #
  34. Blu,
    I was a Hillary supporter. Hopefully she will be chosen as Obama’s running mate. My candidate lost. I got over it. I suggest you do the same if you really are a democrat. Voting for McSame is like voting to shoot yourself in the foot. God! Haven’t you had enough of Bush yet?

    Rick,
    The DNC did not dictate who we voted for. Our caucuses and primaries were not tablulated by Kathleen Harris.
    ed charrington    Jun 09, 07:06 PM CST #
  35. I have previously stated my personal choices for the VP pick on the Obama ticket. With this in mind, let’s consider what President Obama’s cabinent might look like.
    How about:
    John Edwards-Attorney General
    Chris Dodd-Secretary of State
    Bob Kerrey-Secretary of HEW
    Sam Nunn-Secretary of Defense
    Bill Clinton-Ambassador to the UN
    The list goes on and on. The backlog of highly qualified Democrats to fill these positions is significant, and we may be on the cusp of a very exciting time. We must grasp the opportunity, NOW! We must do our very best to elect Sen. Obama. Sen. McCain does represent the “old school”, and another Republican administration, after the previous 8 years of greed, corruption, scandal and general incompentance, would be a disaster for this country. We must not snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, as we did in 2000.
    kevin shepherd    Jun 09, 10:14 PM CST #
  36. Sorry I missed so much of this conversation but my power was out due to a storm. I attended my county convention this Saturday and I don’t think I’m cut out for politics. Deceipt and manipulation just make me feel sick to my stomach. I moved down here towards Lincoln for several reasons but one was because I wanted to be more involved with the Democratic Party and its decision-making. What a bad year – for me anyway – to have reality kick me in the butt.

    Like some of you up-thread, I belive Hillary Clinton far outshined Obama in all aspects—for the abilities needed to be a great president. I am simply very sad as I consider what happened. I believe had she had any semblance of equal coverage by the media and did not have democrats bashing her death, she would have won. It is the fact that my fellow democrats treated a person who has given her life to the causes we all claim to hold so dear and to the advancement of the democratic party and fellow democrats—so badly and with such zeal, that I find myself in a place of confusion. I don’t know if I’m still a democrat. I’m 47 years old, and even though 30 years isn’t that long to have been involved in politics… I feel like my heart and soul were born to be democrats … until the last few months. I can’t tell you how many times it has felt like I was fighting the Republicans this year with the level of vile and hatred being spewed at me and my candidate.

    Now, lets just agree I’m some form of a pathetic person and that I should “get over it” and get behind Obama. That’s what everyone is telling those of us who feel this way to do. But, it doesn’t feel possible right now. There are such BAD feelings. Someone said on Saturday, its time to stop being emmotional and get logical. Boy, how I wish that was the mentality that was used to select our nominee! Realistically, Hillary was better prepared, better supported in the “must win” states in November, voted for by more human beings, etc. etc. That sounds like the type of logic I’m used to dealing with. Instead, we were told over and over again how Obama made everyone “feel” and all the hope fluff I could stand – actually more than I could stand. I think that’s what has me in this no-man’s land … logic went out the window here. I don’t get carried away … ever. And certainly not when considering who to hire to lead a super power. It scares the hell out of me that that is what this nominee’s campaign is based on.

    I don’t know what I will do going forward, but I want to make it very clear to individuals here, to the Nebraska democratic leadership and to the national democratic leadership that this is a bigger problem than you think and if you take it for granted that it will all be OK in Novemer, you might find yourselves disappointed. But hey, I’m just a silly individual with one silly vote. I’m sure you can afford to have me alienated. It’s the other 18 million people you might want to think about.
    Marian    Jun 09, 10:45 PM CST #
  37. Marian,
    Your points are well taken by me!
    Rick    Jun 10, 07:16 AM CST #
  38. By me as well Marian. Thank you.
    Blu    Jun 10, 07:31 AM CST #
  39. Marian,
    If character matters to you, you should do some research into how John McSame’s first marriage came to an end. McSame has had more trouble keeping his tallywhacker holstered than Bill Clinton did.
    ed charrington    Jun 10, 07:36 AM CST #
  40. Ed,
    How did you get character out of what Marian was saying. She was talking about Hillary’s abilities.
    But now that you opened a can of worms I will reply. How do we know that Obama doesn’t have the same problem. He’s not fully vetted yet. Skeletons keep falling out of his closet.
    Rick    Jun 10, 07:51 AM CST #
  41. I know that the “McCain first marriage failure” is being trotted out today as another reason not to vote for him … and as much as I hate that men in powerful positions tend to do horrible things to the women that stand by them (FDR, Ronald Reagan (he had a first wife too), JFK, Ted Kennedy, Newt Gingrich, Bill Clinton, John McCain, etc.)—another reason we should give a woman a chance—I doubt you would argue all of these men were worthless leaders. Jimmy Carter was a true gentlemen to his wife all of his life – does that automatically make him an affective leader?

    I still come back to the Presidency and the type of experience needed to lead this country. Believe me, I’ve done my homework and the overwhelming pattern I see in Obama’s life is “how can I get myself elected to the next higher position?”. There’s no point where he stopped and learned a process well, where he put himself out on a limb for his principles, where he accomplished small pictures of what he is promising he will do on a national and global scale. This is the Presidency of the United States! It is not a popularity – gosh I like this guy and he gives me tingles when he talks – contest. *Note: Obama did get stuck in the Il leg. for a while but not by his own choice.

    By the way Ed … the word McShame does the same thing to me that the word Billery did. You have some worthwhile commentary—I don’t think calling people names as a general insult complements your thoughts in my humble opinion.
    Marian    Jun 10, 02:19 PM CST #
  42. Why does everyone keep saying that the super delagates went against the people’s wishes? Obama has a greater count even without the supers. Like I said before, Hilary purposely went against party wishes when she campaigned in Florida and Michigan; then she turned around and split the party over it. She should have taken her name off the ballet same as Obama. It’s dirty tatics like this make me sick of Sen. Clinton.
    cole i    Jun 11, 11:41 AM CST #
  43. Obama has 1,763 pleged without supers
    Clinton has 1,640 pleged without supers
    cole i    Jun 11, 11:44 AM CST #
  44. Cole i,
    You better get your facts straight. Hillary didn’t campaign in Florida or Michigan. Obama had TV ads in Florida. And Obama had people campaigning in Michigan to vote uncommitted. Talk about dirty tactics.
    Rick    Jun 11, 02:22 PM CST #
  45. Obama took his name off the ballot in MI to pander to Iowa (not to mention he knew he would lose)... the sacred Iowa caucus situation needs to end also. Why should one state have so much influence? Hillary left her name on the ballot because she believes the USA still has 50 states and that human beings in all 50 states ought to get to vote for the president. Please don’t think Obama had any noble intentions in his decision – it was political. Period.

    We need a regional primary system where order is chosen by lottery.

    Also Cole, remember that several hundred of Obama’s pledged delegates came from caucuses … which, like Nebraska’s, didn’t represent the will of the people and, he never reached the number of delegates needed to claim the nomination without the SD’s. The SD’s were put in place to decide the winner in a close or contentious contest, they did.
    Marian    Jun 11, 10:09 PM CST #
  46. cole, – “Why does everyone keep saying that the super delagates went against the people’s wishes?”

    Look at the super delegates from the states Clinton won; CA NY PA OH MA NJ AR AZ NM WV … How many of the supers in these states jump on Obama’s bandwagon against the preference of the voters and sometimes before their primaries were even held?

    -”Obama has a greater count even without the supers”

    Because of the “Affirmative Action” clause in the DNC Delegate Selection Rules the urban areas get the lions share of delegates. Also, the MSM spoon fed viewers the anti-Clinton message from the start, propaganda is a very effective tool in winning elections!

    -”Hilary purposely went against party wishes when she campaigned in Florida and Michigan”

    Exactly when did Hillary campaign in either of these states? Please provide a link to the source of this information. Obama is the one that went to FL before the primary and did a interview with the press on Sept 30, 2007. ( http://www2.tbo.com/content/2007/sep/30/obama-vows-do-whats-right/?news-breaking ) Obama also bought air time on cable networks that reached voters in FL before the primaries were held. Both actions were against DNC rules.

    -”She should have taken her name off the ballet same as Obama”

    Obama took his name off the ballot in Michigan to woo the voters in Iowa, the state that thinks it should always be first. There was no rule saying the candidates must remove their names from the ballots of Michigan or Florida.

    -”she turned around and split the party”

    The DNC and Obama split the party, not Clinton.
    Blu    Jun 12, 05:54 AM CST #

Search